January 21, 2015

Jane Eyre - One Pair Of Feet Planted In Independence

(They say that Jane Eyre is a required reading materials for high-school students. So does this mean a high school student can have a decent understanding of this literature classic? I read it when I was 16 or 17, but what I understood back then? “None”(exaggeration I may. I loved the book and watched the movie 6 times!). Because over 30 years later I re-read this book again, it struck me anew, electrified me like no other books!)

Jane Eyre, an orphan, an outcast of her own kindred, a ward of abusive institution, grows into a well learned and highly intelligent young woman. She learned kindness through hardship, learned love through her hateful abusers. Beside all these qualities, she has an earnest disposition for independence, which strikes me the most. Jane RESISTS anything that imposes upon her without her consent, not only cruel abuses but also mellow sweet love. Nothing can stay her way to hinder the will of her own. Yet she is soft, kind, sensitive and forgiving.

When Jane just reaches her maturity, she already possesses an exceptional inner calmness and sharp intelligence that impresses her master Rochester - a middle aged aristocrat - during their first “serious” conversation: “Not three in three thousand raw schoolgirl governesses would have answered me as you have just done.” Yet Rochester dose not want to succumb himself to such usual quality: “But I don't mean to flatter you: if you are cast in a different mould to the majority, it is no merit of yours: Nature did it.”

Jane Eyre, who knows her brain power well, possesses humbleness even better than Rochester can ever imagine. She follows her instinct, resists the temptation from her master, keeps a distance gracefully from him, yet attracts his soul or his heart in every possible situations, like an irresistible magnet. “Courtship” would be a word that truly blaspheme the mutual attraction between Jane and Rochester, because almost every single line of their converse is a volcanic intellectual collision rendered in poetic sonnet form. They enjoy so much their intellectual game playing that physical desire seems to be too trifle to be concerned. Jane Eyre, regardless her “low” social position, not only displays before her master a great self-respect, also she proves her complete qualification of being his “other self”,  “his equal”, or even a real “master” of himself.

Probably, the central question about this book is, WHY OH WHY, for all the good, all the wealth and true love, all the happiness drop in front of her feet, Jane abandons them altogether with such mighty resolution? The answer is simple: because her feet are planted in independence:

"I care for myself. The more solitary, the more friendless, the more unsustained I am, the more I will respect myself. I will keep the law given by God; sanctioned by man. I will hold to the principles received by me when I was sane, and not mad — as I am now. Laws and principles are not for the times when there is no temptation: they are for such moments as this, when body and soul rise in mutiny against their rigour; stringent are they; inviolate they shall be. If at my individual convenience I might break them, what would be their worth? They have a worth — so I have always believed; and if I cannot believe it now, it is because I am insane — quite insane: with my veins running fire, and my heart beating faster than I can count its throbs. Preconceived opinions, foregone determinations, are all I have at this hour to stand by: there I plant my foot."

At age of 18, Jane is just not ready yet to give up her solitary lifestyle. No matter how charming Rochester is, no matter what kind of true love he offers, Jane still longs for her complete independence. Material comfort means nothing to her; somatic desire only yields to her spiritual passion. Even before that wedding day, Jane rejected many of his master’s materialistic offers, such a jewelries, dresses, etc., only to keep herself as plain as before. She doesn't want any more than her basic life needs, any luxury more than what she could afford by herself. Of course, the exposure of the secret during the wedding ceremony smites her heavenly dream, causes immediate change of her plan, but, it is not the only reason, or the true reason. The true reason that she leaves Rochester (I think) is that she realized, living with her master as a mistress, she would lose all her chances to grow into a fully independent woman.

Thus Jane left, throws herself into a complete unknown fate. She spends 2 days in a coach, which takes her as far away from Thornfield as it can, and finally drops her in middle of no where with complete destitution.

"Not a tie holds me to human society at this moment--not a charm or hope calls me where my fellow-creatures are--none that saw me would have a kind thought or a good wish for me. I have no relative but the universal mother, Nature: I will seek her breast and ask repose."

In the following 2 days, she lives as a beggar, starvation and fatigue drive her to the point that she is ready to give up her last bit of pride for just a piece of bread. At the moment when she thinks she would die, fate, or “God” saved her - a young priest finds her at his house threshold, accepts her, and with his two sisters, they kindly provides Jane foods and shelter. Soon, Jane takes a job to educate children in the small village. Understandably, her intellectual aspiration is not satisfied by the job, but she is at least independent.

Of course, we all know what happens later: Jane's fate turns, but her independent soul stands.

Jane Eyre is not a romance book, because it is not about romantic love, but equality and independence. As matter of fact, Jane Eyre reminds me why I dislike romance book - the selfless dependence on each other just bores me to death! Neither, Jane Eyre is a book about “feminism”, because it does not focus on women’s being abused by men, or women’s particular independence, rather, it’s about equality in general, both men and women. Jane Eyre is not a book to be understood by anyone who is yet to be intellectually mature, nor by anyone without any experience or understanding of hardship of mankind, nor, most importantly, by anyone who possess no keen passion for independence. The quality of Jane Eyre, this plain even fragile looking young woman, is not only an inspiration of overcoming hardship, transcending human boundary, but also an icon of individualism to its fullest extent, of heroism with its firmest strength, of humanity at its fullest height.

Charlotte Bronte finished this novel when she was barely 30, died several years after the book published, when she was 39. Lived as short as she did, her spirit lives and shines, by this one book alone, as long as humans live.

 (Reader, to tell you the truth, I still don’t feel my words justify how good this book is. You must find out by yourself, or judge by yourself!)

14 comments:

  1. I appreciate the way you describe Jane Eyre. This is a book I would enjoy. You are right. It may not be appreciated as it should in the high school years... Personally, I don't like "romance" either. I never seem to connect or really care about romance as a genre. Human beings are complex creatures and romance subjects them to something simplistic.
    Reading literature in high school was not the best experience either. It was a poor one, I dare say. But I read a lot by myself because books have always been my passion...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Books also my greatest joy. And reading Jane Eyre has been one of most unbelievable experience. Probably the only similar experience I had before was reading "Les Miserable", except, Charlotte Bronte's writing style is much more succinct, right to the point, which I like it much more than Hugo's eloquence.
      I ranked 'Rebecca" as my all time favorite book before my middle age, now I have to Jane Eyre in front of it! lol

      Delete
    2. Julia, I just realized as popular as this book is, there are still people who have not read it yet! So I just removed a couple of spoilers in my post. However it's too late for you. But I believe (as I mentioned in my post), no matter how much story plots you know, the book is still a joy to read.

      Delete
    3. Yes, of course.
      A few days ago I saw Les Miserable at Barnes and Noble and thought that I should read it this year!

      Delete
    4. And I want to clarify something. My high school experience in literature was insufficient, not poor.

      Delete
    5. Julia, my high school literature experience was basically a self education - I entered an art high school where the focus was all art. I spent most of my time in library myself.

      Delete
    6. How interesting, Yun. Art and literature are deeply connected so I'm surprised to read this about your formal education. It helps to confirm that there is a great deficiency in formal education. Isaac Asimov said that the only true education is self-education.

      Delete
    7. Julia, my art education was in China, where it was extremely skill oriented, which I deeply disliked it. My art profession had been a chain of my intellectual freedom, invoked my love&hate relationship toward art, also my abnormal resentment toward art profession. But I try my best to understand this is just my personal opinion. :-)
      Thanks. And I do agree that art and literature are closely related.

      Delete
    8. I think this dissociation happens in most places.
      I believe subjects in schools should also be integrated, but they are regarded as separate boxes.

      Delete
    9. True, Julia. Things are much worse in China though.

      Delete
  2. Have to confess, yunyi, I've never actually read Jane Eyre. My impression of her is mostly through the Joan Fontaine characterization in the 1944 movie. She came off as having quite the indomitable spirit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Marty, I also watched part of that movie and didn't really like it. Joan Fontaine may tried her best, but by my opinion, she did not have that inner strength of Jane Eyre.

      Delete
  3. Yun, I too had read Jane Eyre many years ago —perhaps more than a quarter of a century. But let me assure you, your description of the central character is pretty close to the impressions I had at the time. Even though a male, I had identified with the vehemence with which Jane valued her independence.

    You have captured the essence of her character capably and inspired me to pick the redoubtable classic yet again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Uma. I might be exaggerated to say that I understood "none" of this book back when I was in high school, because I loved the book (much more than Wuthering Heights), and watched the movie 6 times! However, maybe partly because of Chinese translation, partly because of my young age, I do not believe I had the same impact as I had this time.
      I hope you would enjoy to re-read it. It's worth to read several times and I believe each time one would have different experience, more or less.

      Delete