The movie was relatively short, probably too short comparing with original, that's why I was disappointed the first time when I watched it. However, something dragged me back to theater, and after several times re-watching it, I had to admit, the power of the movie was almost equal to the book.
Of course, not really. Nothing could compare, or even get close to Charlotte Bronte's original masterpiece. The passion released by her words cannot be righteously expressed in any other forms. However, cinematic performance has different means to influence its audiences: music, scenery, and lively performance. Yes, the last one might be the most important, for if we agree that this film version really is the best, we probably owe it the most to Susannah York and George Scott.
It is true that they both appear to be much older than the ages of characters in original book, but it seems to me, physical ages do not matter so much in this timeless tale. Further more, I even think that the older physical/biological ages can do better justice to the mental ages of original characters, for both of their personalities display great complication: maturity, intelligence, sternness and many other more which I cannot find words to describe at this moment. I especially like Susannah York's Jane, who is plain but graceful, obedient but self-respectful, passionate yet self restrained, a perfect Jane Eyre!
My second favorite screen adaptation of Jane Eyre is BBC TV series in 2006, stars Ruth Wilson and Toby Stephens. I don't quite like Stephens' Rochester (he just lacks that noble appearance and profoundness of Rochester), but Wilson's Jane is definitely my second favorite. Wilson did a superb job on acting in this show, and the only thing I think that she did not surpass Susannah York is her lack of the inner calmness (which is the first quality Jane impresses Rochester) and ascetic appearance. I found Wilson is a bit too physically healthy and sexy to real Jane, who has been in an abusive institution for 8 years.
The film version of 1970 was released in England as film, in US as TV movie. I was lucky to watch it in theaters back in China. I watched it 6 times back then. As if it's not enough, recently, after over 30 years later, I again spent $3 purchased a streaming version from Amazon, watched (most part of) it, and felt overwhelmed once more. I also briefly watched several other versions, and now I had to admit this one is my favorite. Though many others might be more truthful on following original's story line, but this film, with York and Scott's superb performance, reflects the true spirit of the original the most.
Oh, The soundtrack is just as timeless! Whenever I drift back to Thornfield, this music is with me!
Thanks for this recommendation, Yun. You sparked my interest in this movie!
ReplyDeleteI think you may love it. The amazon version is in extremely poor quality, but I am afraid that's the only version you can get. This movie only shew in this country in TV format, though it was made as a film in Briton, and better than any American version I've seen.
DeleteThe other day we had a discussion regarding God and today I came across this article that I wanted to share with you. This little girl really nails it. Here's the link:http://news.yahoo.com/weeping-philippine-girl-challenges-pope-prostitution-064923640.html
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link! It's quite heartbreaking to facing such question from a 12 year-old.
DeleteTalking about child-abuse, I again have to say, Chinese culture is the "champion"! Once I said that the history of Chinese morality is the history of child abuse. I may exaggerated, but not much. If you have no better thing to do, you can click the label "Child abuse" on the top of my blog, where you can see quite a many articles I wrote about this topic. But I have to admit those are difficult to read. The center thesis of my past over 10 years Chinese writings revolved around the connection between Chinese tradition and child abuse. Now I am quite down with that, moving on to something better!
I haven't seen this one, yunyi. I have seen the one with Toby Stephens, and the 1944 version with Orson Welles. I think there have been over 25 film adaptations of this novel. I wonder what about it makes it so popular?
ReplyDeleteMarty, I watched 1944 and found Orson Welles doesn't like Rochester, and Joan Fountain looks too frail to Jane Eyre.
DeleteI guess there is a lot of reason for the popularity of this book, but I think the most important one might be Jane's passion for independence.
Yun, I love Charlotte Bronte’s story of Jane Eyre and I’ve seen a couple different movie versions. The one with George C. Scott and Susannah York is the best, I agree. I haven’t seen the BBC version with Ruth Wilson and Toby Stephens but it looks excellent from clips I’ve seen. I’ll have to watch that one. It is a timeless tale, a beautiful tale! Thank you for posting the music too, just lovely.
ReplyDeleteGlad you watched this version and like it. Ruth Wilson version is also very good, the chemistry between two main characters is played very well.
Delete